Re: The future of mipsel port

Paul Gevers <[email protected]> Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:36:15 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 23-07-2023 17:51, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Tue, 18, Jul, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su spoke thus..
>> So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official ports.
>> (And let's keep mips64el port).
> 
> Is there consensus on this point?  If so, should we start making
> arrangements to remove mipsel from the archive?

Speaking as a member of the Release Team, but without having consulted 
with the others, I think we're OK with the removal.

I have not been involved in removal of an architecture before, I think 
it's the Release Team configuration of britney2 that needs to change as 
the first step or at least at the same time as the actual removal from 
the archive, correct?

Paul
OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, 495 B) - not displayed