Re: Difference between mips64el builders?

Hilmar Preusse <[email protected]> Sun, 18 May 2025 11:57:16 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex,gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <aCmu_GUcZPHJa2-o@rasppi3>
--p2kTTcWJJTV1tg4x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 16.05.25 Aurelien Jarno ([email protected]) wrote:
> On 2025-05-15 23:30, Preu=DFe, Hilmar wrote:

Hello,

Thanks for stepping in.

> > https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi tells me that these are "Quad Core
> > Loongson 3A4000", meanwhile the others are "Quad Core Loongson 3A3000".=
 Not
> > sure if that plays a role.
> =20
> Loongson 3A4000 CPU swapped the sNaN and qNaN representation compared to=
=20
> the original MIPS ABI. I guess a[i] contains a qNaN, which is=20
> interpreted as a sNaN on the 3A4000, causing the FPU exception.
>=20
Yes, correct.

> I have Cc:ed the porters so that can help you to find a solution to this=
=20
> issue.
>=20
Currently I understand this as "there is nothing, which can be done
=66rom my side". If you need help, let me know.

Hilmar

--=20

--p2kTTcWJJTV1tg4x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iL0EABECAH0WIQTGd6SdBhZfNVqXZSgB6PhGb/EsMAUCaCmu+l8UgAAAAAAuAChp
c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0QzY3
N0E0OUQwNjE2NUYzNTVBOTc2NTI4MDFFOEY4NDY2RkYxMkMzMAAKCRAB6PhGb/Es
MEqwAJwN+o7TWKhgF52t6xUi07v/eM5c8gCgnsw9/ITnn6dvII9uqZgGGNWJnu8=
=NJFT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--p2kTTcWJJTV1tg4x--