Re: Difference between mips64el builders?
Hilmar Preusse <[email protected]> Sun, 18 May 2025 11:57:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.tetex,gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aCmu_GUcZPHJa2-o@rasppi3> |
--p2kTTcWJJTV1tg4x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16.05.25 Aurelien Jarno ([email protected]) wrote: > On 2025-05-15 23:30, Preu=DFe, Hilmar wrote: Hello, Thanks for stepping in. > > https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi tells me that these are "Quad Core > > Loongson 3A4000", meanwhile the others are "Quad Core Loongson 3A3000".= Not > > sure if that plays a role. > =20 > Loongson 3A4000 CPU swapped the sNaN and qNaN representation compared to= =20 > the original MIPS ABI. I guess a[i] contains a qNaN, which is=20 > interpreted as a sNaN on the 3A4000, causing the FPU exception. >=20 Yes, correct. > I have Cc:ed the porters so that can help you to find a solution to this= =20 > issue. >=20 Currently I understand this as "there is nothing, which can be done =66rom my side". If you need help, let me know. Hilmar --=20 --p2kTTcWJJTV1tg4x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iL0EABECAH0WIQTGd6SdBhZfNVqXZSgB6PhGb/EsMAUCaCmu+l8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0QzY3 N0E0OUQwNjE2NUYzNTVBOTc2NTI4MDFFOEY4NDY2RkYxMkMzMAAKCRAB6PhGb/Es MEqwAJwN+o7TWKhgF52t6xUi07v/eM5c8gCgnsw9/ITnn6dvII9uqZgGGNWJnu8= =NJFT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p2kTTcWJJTV1tg4x--