Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky

John Klos <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <9fc0c48b-7699-694e-7a1e-f76a5b0cb577__16800.3571032145$1761674456$gmane$org@daisy.zia.io>
> yes - maintaining all special cases is an effort.

> yes, but your mileage may vary: You often have a special case where general
> performance measuerement didb't catch the use case.

> yes - that are all people involde in debian or generally in Open Source.

> yes, throwing out old clumsy code with special workaround for old hardware flaws
> is a great cleanup.

It seems you're talking about something different than what the discussion 
is about: this discussion is about the baselines for generated binaries. 
This isn't a discussion about dropping support for certain architectures 
and removing code.

I carefully asked what I asked because I'd like to see real data about 
what advantages there are to defaulting compiler flags to an x86-64 level 
other than default, for instance.

Answering "yes" without providing any information or links to information 
or measurements isn't really all that helpful.

Thanks,
John Klos