removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental

Ansgar 🙀 <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:03:56 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.wb-team,gmane.linux.debian.ports.arm,gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

--=-u7F8fewo8uX6l8TSVKQA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

nobody opposed the removal of mips64el (#1105972) or armel (#1113679)
from unstable nor did anyone want to move either architecture to ports.
So I guess we can go ahead with the removal.

w-b team: Could you please disable buildds for mips64el and armel for
Debian unstable and experimental?

I'll look at removing the architectures from the archive later.

Ansgar

--=-u7F8fewo8uX6l8TSVKQA
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><style>pre,code,address {
  margin: 0px;
}
h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
  margin-top: 0.2em;
  margin-bottom: 0.2em;
}
ol,ul {
  margin-top: 0em;
  margin-bottom: 0em;
}
blockquote {
  margin-top: 0em;
  margin-bottom: 0em;
}
</style></head><body><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>nobody opposed the r=
emoval of mips64el (#1105972) or armel (#1113679) from unstable nor did any=
one want to move either architecture to ports. So I guess we can go ahead w=
ith the removal.</div><div><br></div><div>w-b team: Could you please disabl=
e buildds for mips64el and armel for Debian unstable and experimental?</div=
><div><br></div><div>I'll look at removing the architectures from the archi=
ve later.</div><div><br></div><div>Ansgar</div><div><br></div><div><span></=
span></div></body></html>

--=-u7F8fewo8uX6l8TSVKQA--