Re: Bug#1113679: removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental

Hi,

On Sun, 2025-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 11/1/25 3:03 PM, Ansgar =F0=9F=99=80 wrote:
> > nobody opposed the removal of mips64el (#1105972) or armel (#1113679)=
=20
> > from unstable nor did anyone want to move either architecture to ports.=
=20
> > So I guess we can go ahead with the removal.
> >=20
> > w-b team: Could you please disable buildds for mips64el and armel for=
=20
> > Debian unstable and experimental?
> I think that's done. Aur=C3=A9lien disabled the distributions on the buil=
dds=20
> and I turned off the relevant wanna-build bits. We should no longer be=
=20
> ingesting it and the data has been pruned from the database (which=20
> dictates what is being looked at).

Thanks.

Both armel and mips64el should now be removed from unstable,
experimental, and related debug and buildd suites.

Ansgar