Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

Graham Whaley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <CAF9eJumYrgA9i3jhC_36x=uR4PfeP75Ap0X823qUM4y0rdE2BA@mail.gmail.com>
On 29 October 2013 13:40, Aron Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> What we are running isn't any of them, and the 2-way server board
> looks promising.
>
> Thanks both. OK, so I've no details from Loongson about the boards they
have for me yet either - I suspect it may be the same as your board.

What we need to consider here is also board price and availability. We can
buy 2f mini-PCs, relatively cheap and easily. If they satisfy a need then
they may be (a mid-term/interim) solution to shortage of hardware right
now. If I find we can source the 3A DDR3 motherboards easily them yippee,
but right now that is less clear than sourcing the 2F mini-PC's.


>
> I don't know if IPMI is available, but there is certain kind of PCI
> device that can help with remotely power on/off the machine controlled
> by SMS. I'm curious if DSA think IPMI is mandatory for buildd and
> porterbox.
>
> I think DSA would like to make it a requirement for the future, but they
are pragmatic, and right now many boxes (not just MIPS) do not have good
remote power/reset control. There are external boxes that can do this
though, and we are investigating them already for internal use, and I'll
share any useful findings.


> --
> Regards,
> Aron Xu
>

 thanks guys - I'll keep you posted with my progress as well.

 Graham
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.