Re: Building mercurial in a buildd that's not lucatelli

Javi Merino <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <20131123085531.GA2640@tesla>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:00:15AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Javi Merino ([email protected]) [131120 09:49]:
> > Is it possible to build mercurial 2.8-2 in a mips buildd that's not
> > lucatelli?
> 
> rescheduled

It's been in "building" for almost two days[0], shall I assume that it
has failed?

[0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mercurial

Thanks,
Javi
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=U2kr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.