Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?

Steve McIntyre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <20140910150520.GO24523__14329.4233167127$1410361659$gmane$org@einval.com>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
>all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
>confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
>noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also
>clearly meant to be discussing the debian-ports setup itself rather
>than individual ports, and that's also off-topic for those ports that
>are in the main archive. So, I propose:
>
> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
>   mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it as they
>   see fit normally. This would be specifically for "discussions about
>   ports.debian.org and architectures hosted there".
>
> * Explicitly do *not* add another exploder to replace the old
>   address: instead, *if* we want something to cover this use case,
>   add a new list that interested people can subscribe to. Maybe
>   "debian-cross-ports" or "debian-architectures" or something. Please
>   feel free to suggest a better name! If such a list were to be set
>   up, we could/should encourage existing architecture porters to sign
>   up there too.
>
>Thoughts?

Any dissenting opinions?

Listmasters - are you happy to change things like I propose?

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [email protected]
  Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline,
  Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to
  concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.