Re: Bug#787258: FTBFS on mipsel: test-suite failures

Martin Pitt [2015-06-01  8:02 +0200]:
> Since this doesn't happen on our mipsel porter box, and I don't have
> any other mipsel hardware to check this on, it seems this needs some
> help from the mipsel buildd maintainers. It would be really helpful if
> our buildd and the porter box were more alike, to be able to reproduce
> such issues?

Today's upload had no test failures:

  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mipsel&ver=220-3&stamp=1433167263

This was built on mipsel-aql-01. Looking into the history on

  https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mipsel

it seems that mipsel-aql-01 never failed, while mipsel-manda-01
recently always failed, and eberlin is somewhat random. I guess one
shouldn't read too much into that short history, presumably they are
all a bit flaky. But do you know anything fundamental (kernel version
etc.) where the porter box (eder) is different from these buildds?

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=FLsA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----