Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <A3F2133D-CEA2-42D5-A4D3-5DACFE6EC772__24127.2929627032$1437586265$gmane$org@physik.fu-berlin.de>
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all porters should be aware of.

It's not really that mails going to debian-ports@ appear that often.

PS: Excuse my quoting style, currently on mobile.

Adrian

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:04 PM, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:38:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>>>> Alexander Wirt dixit:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from
>>>>>> listmaster side?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Remove whatever [email protected] is right now
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2. Create a new [email protected] mailing list which
>>>>>  works just like the other regular lists
>>>>> 
>>>>> 3. Announce the new [email protected] so that people
>>>>>  can subscribe to it; document that there is no longer
>>>>>  an address to reach *all* ports but that people should
>>>>>  eMail the individual ports’ lists (and cross-post if
>>>>>  needed, but only to the amount needed), and that the
>>>>>  new [email protected] instead is a mailing list for
>>>>>  discussion about
>>>>>  a) debian-ports.org infrastructure
>>>>>  b) porting Debian in general
>>>>>  c) questions related to setting up a Debian port,
>>>>>     including wanna-build, buildd, etc.
>> 
>> That seems like a bad idea to me, tbh. There will be people who won't
>> notice that the meaning of debian-ports@ has changed, and who will try
>> to use it with its old meaning.
>> 
>> If there are problems with the current meaning of debian-ports, can't we
>> just retire the old alias and create a list under a different name?
> 
> Is there much point to that? I've not heard anybody at all speak up in
> favour of the existing behaviour. If anybody does use try to use it
> that way in future, the new list will most likely be the best place
> for their mail to go...
> 
> -- 
> Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [email protected]
> "I used to be the first kid on the block wanting a cranial implant,
> now I want to be the first with a cranial firewall. " -- Charlie Stross
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.