Re: Please consider manual building of phyml on mipsel architecture
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2016-04-21 16:28, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi mips porters, > > I noticed that phyml does not build on mipsel[1] but it has built > before. Since I remember that different porter boxes behave differently > it might be possible that some manual intervention is needed. Please > could you take the necessary action to let phyml pass and migrate to > testing? In general packages should be built on the build daemons, not manually. In that case the issue was related to a bug in openmpi that has been fixed since the package has been built. Requeuing the package was enough, it has been built successfully and uploaded. In the future, please mail [email protected] for such requests. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXGP/PAAoJELqceAYd3YybHvEQAIo8jv87ggIZingPiaH2idGO hKuBf7aeJ0/H0bEhJW0L2pAt8RKjs6zlObk3dTn/mEv7QuRrZI47G8iCMbFMFOnt E4pIkCE8b1PO5lbryYXRbVvhZBbQX6M+/U5dgSbfkGsGc3UGectArgjcbbwSiTtE isa3WH59LWRiUaOrHhCSnjua8/NrZSR2HYmIznW9RyG76Y+ZPFseDJJPlnyIwv85 z3XlB8Dg6m30ng/xTfR6ktSX6mliH2FgQzvI+TdObSA9H5R5PFxIh2YqPqFnHlXE uhwSUOlVgRRQNbhAv/xzg+21P6Bkynh/f6gjza3jXcG9CRktxNzaTsNKzMNcSyhl PhLH9fJA6RmvKixuFibFAkrktiNp2yBhPCB7tcc7S2N5wmnt3K9Rp5jnYS839aHi Xti82JzK0Ewz7e6SMJDEYh6mELW0nnZKdCL547sjf40KXxTjY/TUbs9M+op3niaf k7G+hUBiv1ImcwKaA7PXVMdH6+4FhTFhuyBIebxuLMZwJrzPq2N5xYFFbKJ15ZOt AN1nMaSVDV9sq5pv8HedH4mHyKUY9GB0OzH/lfj5s/SPoSb8qaoJUVTWgLxhrjAj vyUZB9LMduLbJgYAs0DhUxLJEPHb/QK+gZrHNSMvUbAJuzfyHzvJrerrZunlIsHw 5IyazZApFy0QkkUJs7Yr =j7xL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----