Re: mips64el in testing

YunQiang Su:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [...]
>> AFAICT, we are still missing:
>>
>>  * A rebuild of the last package [mipsel64import]
> 
> This is a bug of gcc, and the gcc team in IMG is working on it.
> It also effects lua.
> 

Thanks for the update. :)

>>  * DSA maintained buildds (admittedly, I did not look for one).
> 
> mips64el shares the same machines with mipsel.
> All machines for mipsel can be configured to build for mips64el at the
> same time.
> 
> [...]

In other words, there is a DSA buildd?

I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds:

 * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01,
   mipsel-manda-02
   - I presume none of them are DSA given mips64el currently has a note
     of not having a DSA buildd.

 * mipsel: mayer, eysler, rem, phrixos (non-DSA), helle (non-DSA)

Are these lists up to date?  If so, we only seem to have 4 DSA buildds
to be shared between mipsel and mips64el.  Are some of these being
migrated to/replaced with DSA buildds?

Thanks,
~Niels

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wXUw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----