Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+7wUsxU4O8_qAoYTm=VdzV51BKjoGgg=qU+LG4y+t06KV_uWw__26668.1628804237$1475269391$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
Adrian, On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > On the other hand, some packages dropped support for PowerPC32 like Mono > but this isn't a concern for most users, I would say. [...] Thanks very much for stepping up as porter, you have my vote ! However I need to mention that the specific ppc/mono issue is in fact pretty interesting. The long thread is on [email protected] but the short version is that this issue only happen because we build the ppc32 mono version on a ppc64 kernel, I know that since I did debug this issue. I have not heard from the ppc64el porters, but I suspect ppc64 will not be a release arch. So you need to take into consideration that for powerpc to remain a release arch, one need minimal working ppc64 port. Could we solve the situation of ppc64 for Stretch, could it be moved to official release arch ? -M