Re: Enabling PIE by default for Stretch

Maximiliano Curia <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:21:11 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID	<20161010122111.d3gycxehyabu3rwy__14649.993464309$1476102144$gmane$org@gnuservers.com.ar>

¡Hola Niels!

El 2016-10-10 a las 05:44 +0000, Niels Thykier escribió:
> Niels Thykier:
>> As brought up on the meeting last night, I think we should try to go for 
>> PIE by default in Stretch on all release architectures! 
>>  * It is a substantial hardening feature 
>>  * Upstream has vastly reduced the performance penalty for x86 
>>  * The majority of all porters believe their release architecture is 
>>    ready for it. 
>>  * We have sufficient time to solve any issues or revert if it turns out 
>>    to be too problematic.

>> [...]

>>  * Deadline for major concerns:  Fri, 7th of October 2016.

> It appears that there were no major concerns.  I will follow up #835148 
> and request PIE by default for the following architectures.

> * amd64 
> * arm64 
> * armel 
> * armhf 
> * i386 
> * mips 
> * mips64el 
> * mipsel 
> * ppc64el 
> * s390x

Such a change will produce unneeded FTBFS's in libraries using -fPIC (such as 
qt5 and all it's dependencies).

Afaik, -fPIC is stronger than -fPIE, at the same time, -fPIE is incompatible 
with -fPIC and -fPIE makes little sense in shared libraries.

And while a single patch should be trivial, I fear they would be many specific 
ones.

Happy hacking,
-- 
"If a thing is done wrong often enough, it becomes right" -- Leahy's Law
 Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 801 B)