Re: how to deal with "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory"?

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 01:51:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-10-14 14:12, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:28:28PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > Hi MIPS gurus,
> > > 
> > > We have
> > > Bug#837403: connectome-workbench: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE
> > > due to inability to build that package on mips
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=connectome-workbench&arch=mips&ver=1.2.3-2&stamp=1473733739
> > > or mipsel
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=connectome-workbench&arch=mipsel&ver=1.2.3-2&stamp=1473733554
> > > 
> > > both of which fail with
> > > 
> > > "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory"
> > > 
> > > What would be your recommendation -- demand removing mips* from
> > > supported architectures or there is a chance... ? ;)
> > 
> > The build log says
> >   make -j4
> > 
> > This is due to the following in debian/rules:
> >   dh $@ --parallel --sourcedirectory=src
> > 
> > Running 4 instances of the compiler in parallel can quadruple
> > the memory usage. 
> 
> That is true, however the amount of memory per 32-bit process is
> unchanged and still limited to 2GB, so I doubt it will make any
> change.

The error message just tells that mmap() failed with ENOMEM,
but looking at the hardware specs of the autobuilders I agree
with you that my suggestion is not likely to help here.

> Aurelien

cu
Adrian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.