Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#834856: python-pysam fails to build on mips64el arch.: failed test

control: severity -1 important
control: retitle -1 python-pysam: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: segmentation fault in testsuite

On 2016-10-23 12:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/10/16 00:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2016-10-21 15:15, James Cowgill wrote:
> >> On 21/10/16 14:55, YunQiang Su wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Control: severity -1 serious
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:29:48 -0700 Afif Elghraoui <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> Control: severity -1 important
> >>>>> Control: tag -1 + help
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello and thank you for the report.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> على الجمعـة 19 آب 2016 ‫14:48، كتب Jonathan Jackson:
> >>>>>> Package: python-pysam
> >>>>>> Version: 0.9.1.4+ds-1
> >>>>>> Severity: grave
> >>>>>> Justification: renders package unusable
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While the package may be unusable on mips64el, it works well for the
> >>>>> vast majority of users as I understand it, so this situation deserves a
> >>>>> severity of 'important' rather than 'grave'.
> >>>>
> >>>> mips64el is a release architecture, thus this bug is serious.
> >>>
> >>> mips64el seems building successfully now, while mipsel fails.
> >>> I guess it is due to Loongson machine.
> >>
> >> If mips64el has built (possibly one of the build machines is 'nicer' to
> >> it), is this bug RC anymore?
> >>
> >>> Let me have a give-back on mipsel.
> >>
> >> While it could help, the same segfault happens on armel, mipsel and x32
> >> according to the build logs. I don't think it's hardware specific.
> >>
> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-pysam
> > 
> > I agree with this analysis. I confirm it doesn't build either on
> > eller.d.o and from what I have been able to start debugging with GDB, it
> > rather looks like some bug in the 32-bit support. There is something
> > wrong in htslib or the cython code which doesn't convert C struct into
> > Python struct correctly.
> > 
> > I therefore also suggest to downgrade the severity of this bug, maybe
> > also retitling it to say it fail to all 32-bit architectures.
> 
> Sounds good.
> 

Ok, doing so with this mail.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected]                 http://www.aurel32.net