Re: Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open?
James Cowgill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On 17/01/17 09:21, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:02:13 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> as additional input, please have a look at [1] which just recently
>> popped up. There seem to be still unresolved issues with binutils on
>> mips*. We had quite a few regressions since the 2.28 snapshots were
>> uploaded and we still seem to be running into them.
>
>> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851412
>
> There's also https://bugs.debian.org/851642 ("src:perl FTBFS on
> mips64el"), and I noticed that iodine also FTBFS on mips65el (without
> any code changes):
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=iodine&ver=0.7.0-7&arch=mips64el
Both of these bugs were caused by the systemd bug, so when binutils /
systemd is fixed they should build again.
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYfiZaAAoJEMfxZ23qLQHvZ0oP/RDuHmLFft0L0/jW7miXODgw wlH+AA3EviKLwK5Kkhs96p8J9dIr8PZpa1WLa2T6o/+xLrzKQOBcW7mHxDAeJX41 uLyr7GlVvzJE46OI2PhRg99L9nDMkgeOd0DxOl1t31tUKwmIbuhCYl+YVhuZoU1I o+rcQPlcZ+vzeDJUJUgwVrMeIjBfhIZF30/pHqyO+sQVimYxqWLBAIGDeZlDLem+ jdj7kyzcNnLqa6hw6Czf0OLzsRgIpq0pguNXLw2i2XIx6RbrwKYq2ZNKcyRgKx+I nAgY5yMHFa6LkaoLQvpTeiwG9Aum+ckq1+XEQ5Ym6oSOtpiORSLYXNFodcPoPkPU Ucb85bwyOHna5lycuJlP94cMl+rbanqokMycBA0h+79zAiG6DzJRwejm0ZU6i79Z rwV2dVTEF2HrJpaSTt+bnpTQPTh3CzMCZLrQofwjv491bHy78ckF2P7T6K1jDn7P 8z4UbVffPAAG6Cy8mrU2pTr/t7434uizUz/PbcHjyG7fM55glz1QgjEiEHo7CVk1 pLNJF9qptTYcAMhO1O4+6JNmchlwDICNUy3bsBMVENBawjNQqRLR+B9w8jKR0QBW +5G0LpxMYJuPXc1xma9Etm3TovSsTcvi1jus+d3R2UpcCDU/aizNUhdp7agOLqhU EBaLTqGagePe61MXl7p/ =D/zj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----