Bug#879814: apt: debian-installer FTBFS: missing syscalls for seccomp [mips,mipsel,ppc64el]

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <150901161056.1756.2649172222581436913.reportbug__25010.4194543839$1509011846$gmane$org@armor.home>
Package: apt
Version: 1.6~alpha2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: FTBFS

[ X-D-Cc: debian-boot@, debian-mips@, debian-powerpc@ ]

Hi,

Following the bump from alpha1 to alpha2, the situation improved quite a
bit for the d-i daily builds (see #879662 for context). I've triggered a
manual build for all archs, and if my copying/pasting is correct, the
results are as follows:

    armel:    alpha2, OK
    armhf:    alpha1, KO ← the apt alpha2 build came in late, wasn't available yet.
    arm64:    alpha2, OK
    amd64:    alpha2, OK
    i386:     alpha2, OK
    mips:     alpha2, **** Seccomp prevented execution of syscall 0000004117 on architecture mips ****
    mipsel:   alpha2, **** Seccomp prevented execution of syscall 0000004117 on architecture mipsel ****
    mips64el: alpha2, OK
    powerpc:  alpha2, OK
    ppc64el:  alpha2, **** Seccomp prevented execution of syscall 0000000117 on architecture ppc64el ****
    s390x:    alpha2, OK

Porters: Julian mentioned it would be best if one could look at allowing
extra syscalls through a config file[1], so as to detect other syscalls
that might be needed as well (as it stands, the first offender triggers
a failure, so we don't get a full list).

 1. https://bugs.debian.org/879662#39


KiBi.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.