Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 02:47:19PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:

> 1. remove all patches which disable tests on big endians (I would have
> even patched to remove upstream skips on those archs, so we do not fall
> into the trap of missing smth)

I agree with that.

> 2. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I do not think that there
> is some flag to say smth like
> 
>     Architecture: any [!big-endian]
> 
> so we would need to unlist them explicitly
> 
>     Architecture: any [!s390x, !powerpc, !mips]
> 
> (or powerpc is not BE?)

No, leave "Architecture: any". Then the builds will fail on those arches. This
is what porters generally prefer, because they have a clear information about
what is wrong with the package on their arch (and possibly they can act and
send patches).

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://www.debian.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=m0dl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----