Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <CAPweEDye++sfkELPSs5J88_TC7-v-BcRMK+XLK7LmpEaG7pGog__25975.8088425317$1530272212$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Adam D. Barratt
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>  i don't know: i'm an outsider who doesn't have the information in
>> short-term memory, which is why i cc'd the debian-riscv team as they
>> have current facts and knowledge foremost in their minds.  which is
>> why i included them.
>
> It would have been wiser to do so *before* stating that nothing was
> happening as if it were a fact.

 true... apologies.

>>  ah.  so what you're saying is, you could really do with some extra
>> help?
>
> I don't think that's ever been in dispute for basically any core team
> in Debian.

 :)

> That doesn't change the fact that the atmosphere around the change in
> question has made me feel very uncomfortable and unenthused about SRM
> work. (I realise that this is somewhat of a self-feeding energy
> monster.)

 i hear ya.

l.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.