Re: Debian/MIPSeb: proposal to drop mipseb port?

Adi Kriegisch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <1892176.t65pBI9H2r@ippon>
Hi!

> > > In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's mips32eb port.
> > > If you are using it, please tell us.
> > I am using mips32eb a lot on wifi routers (self-compiled kernel with
> > rootfs on a usb stick). There are some people here at a community
> > wireless network that do use such setups on their rooftops as well.
> 
> What is the advantage of eb than el? better performance?
> I guess most of CPUs support both eb and el.
Actually, up to now I thought, endianess is determined by the CPU and
cannot be changed easily. I chose my kernel and architecture settings
based on those of OpenWRT and the CPUs I use are mainly:
* Ubiquiti RouterStation Pro (Atheros AR7161r2/MIPS 24Kc V7.4)
* TP-Link WDR4300 (Atheros AR9344r2/MIPS 74Kc V4.12)
* TP-Link Archer C5 (Atheros QCA9558v1/MIPS 74Kc V5.0)

> > Please let me know if there is anything I could do to help avoiding the
> > drop.
> 
> We need some more build machines, current we use some ER8s,
> which use NFS as rootfs and they have no FPU.
> So the performance and stability are bad.
I could only offer a spare RouterStation Pro which I use for testing and
compiling/backporting some software like swconfig or hostapd. At least
this device seems stable although it is even older/weaker than those ER8s...

> We also need some more manpower to fix the FTBFS in future.
The issues tagged 'mips' are way out of what I can handle, I am afraid.
Though, I'll keep watching them and hope that there might appear issues
I can deal with!

all the best,
	Adi Kriegisch
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.