Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: Bug#881845: rustc: FTBFS on mips*: test failures
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! On 10/19/18 10:56 AM, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote: > @YunQiang Su <mailto:[email protected]> Are you referring to failures shown in [1] ? > > > If so, here is the overview : > >>test [ui] ui/asm-out-assign-imm.rs >>test [ui] ui/target-feature-gate.rs >>test [ui] ui/target-feature-wrong.rs > > Fix:[2]. Should be ignored. <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/f985e6cfd42ee5ef8e7613d11a002253ab87c52f> > >>test [run-pass] run-pass/invalid_const_promotion.rs > > Needs SIGTRAP added to the list at [3]. <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/run-pass/invalid_const_promotion.rs#L42> > >>test [run-make] run-make-fulldeps/relocation-model > > Bug:[4]. Should be ignored on both mips64 and mips [5]. I'll create Debian patches for those. > Quick comment on the mips. Except of the OOM problems other problems (including the atomics one) on mips are usually > > caused by its usage of llvm's FastISel in unoptimized builds. You could try disabling it or even try optimized build. > > I believe that for 1.28 we could finish the native bootstrapping in optimized build while unoptimized one would OOM. Upstream does that for arm64 as well, see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/ea50bf8850304e8afefa9089792fc077fb54aef4 I can try whether the combination of above all gets me a working rustc on mips*. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913