Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423

Hi Simon,

thanks for testing.

>I'm using Thorsten's regression report in #983423 as my representative
>sample of a package that regressed with schroot 1.6.13-4, because mksh
>builds much more quickly than gcc-14

(You can add mksh-firstbuilt to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS so it doesn’t build
and test binaries for dietlibc/klibc/musl.)

>, but I suspect that the same would
>apply equally to Adrian's regression report in #856877: the important
>factor is probably just "any package that wants to run script(1)
>or expect(1)".

I think so.

>I was not able to reproduce the mksh build failure, so there must be
>some relevant difference in setup (other than CPU architecture, which

Oh, okay. Adrian?

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<ch> you introduced a merge commit        │<mika> % g rebase -i HEAD^^
<mika> sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │<mika> Segmentation
<ch> should have cloned into a clean repo      │  fault (core dumped)
<ch> if I rebase that now, it's really ugh     │<mika:#grml> wuahhhhhh