Re: Bug#983423: schroot: regression presumably in 1.6.13-4 after fixing #983423
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc,gmane.linux.debian.ports.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon McVittie dixit: >I was not aware of any mips* buildds still on 4.9 (Debian 9 kernel). The >only mips family architecture listed on buildd.debian.org is mips64el, for I think 4.9 is some mipsel buildds. Shortly after the discussion, which I’m attaching as I don’t know where it’s otherwise archived, mipsel was removed from sid with no fanfare or announcement, so I think those now only build for the old releases’ security support, but the porters/buildd admins would know. Also unsure whether any derivative distro still has mipsel with sid packages (but it then is their problem to obtain newer kernels). >If there are unofficial mips* buildds outside the buildd.debian.org >infrastructure, then I would hope that either they can be upgraded to a >Debian 10 or later kernel, or they can run a Debian 12 or older user-space >(in particular, not keeping up with the latest sbuild). Or that. >However, if I'm >reading kernel git history correctly, the patch proposed on #1079124 >should in principle work with any 4.7+ kernel (not tested). This would >not have been broad enough compatibility in 2017, but seems OK now. Yes, certainly. Thanks, //mirabilos -- When he found out that the m68k port was in a pretty bad shape, he did not, like many before him, shrug and move on; instead, he took it upon himself to start compiling things, just so he could compile his shell. How's that for dedication. -- Wouter, about my Debian/m68k revival
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 2.8 KB) - not displayed
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 5.2 KB) - not displayed
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 3.7 KB) - not displayed
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 27 KB) - not displayed
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 9.9 KB) - not displayed
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 11.6 KB) - not displayed