Re: Firefox 52esr on PPC32 is outdated

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <b3a64628a2f5650c40b0c722d625f49aaf504b39.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 13:04 -0300, Leo Historias wrote:
> Thanks for your explanation,but  why Node.JS?

Because Firefox upstream decided they want to transpile Javascript files during
the build process instead of the development process.

> Why don't we have it on ppc32?

Because it's not been fully ported to 32-bit PowerPC. I started working on it and
some others did, but it was never finished. As I said before, all these things
require a lot of human resources, i.e manpower.

> One alternative is to build either Firefox using nodejsc

I have no idea what NodeJSC is. As I said, one could cross-transpile the JavaScript
files for 32-bit PowerPC and other architectures without NodeJS support.

But someone has to do the actual work and I cannot clone myself.

> or use a version of Firefox that requires rust but not Node.JS

We're using the Firefox version that is part of Debian. Maintaining a custom version
is extremely time-consuming.


Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.