Re: About browsers (again) [was Re: Firmware for Broadcom BCM4318 Wireless LAN Controller]

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <144c2e5089802deade24267bbdda5a7b7cd70875.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Hello João,

On Sat, 2024-09-28 at 10:36 +0100, João wrote:
> SeaLion is definitely worth considering, but it is not part of the distribution,
> and it would be desirable if Debian PPC (we are talking about big endian PPC,
> and I'm using PPC64 myself) would have a modern featurefull browser available.
> 
> Of course everyone (I should say most people ;)) would want Firefox, but from
> the threads you quote below I was under the impressions that there was little
> hope to get it working, but from Adrian's email on this thread I get the
> impression that it is still worth pursuing?

Oracle ships a current version of Firefox on Solaris SPARC which is a big-endian
target and they have published all of their patches in their Github repository
for the Solaris userland [1].

Thus, someone that is interested in Firefox on big-endian PowerPC should sit down
and take the time to try building a Debian Firefox package with the Oracle patches
applied.

> Would packaging SeaLion in Debian be a worthwhile alternative goal? 

A web browser is a huge potential security thread so packaging and maintaining it
requires a lot of patience and diligence. For that very reason, the Debian FTP
team will most likely reject a SeaLion package if it's submitted unless there is
a dedicated maintainer behind it.

Adrian

> [1] https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/tree/master/components/desktop/firefox/patches

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.