Re: About browsers (again) [was Re: Firmware for Broadcom BCM4318 Wireless LAN Controller]
David VANTYGHEM <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello,
There are lots of browsers. I tried to classify them by engine. Don't
hesitate to notify errors or missing. Browsers based on Chromium are
interesting because they integrate WebXR and can work with virtual reality .
Browsers based on Mozilla Gecko engine :
- Firefox
- GNU IceCat : https://icecatbrowser.org. A free version of Firefox.
- Floorp, fork of Firefox ESR : https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp.
- FireDragon, fork of Floorp :
https://github.com/dr460nf1r3/firedragon-browser.
- Ghostery, fork of Firefox :
https://github.com/ghostery/user-agent-desktop.
- Helix, fork of PulseBrowser :
https://github.com/pulse-browser/experiment.
- LibreWolf, fork of Firefox : https://librewolf-community.gitlab.io.
- Mypal, fork of Firefox : https://mypal-browser.org. Works well with
Windows XP.
- Mercury, fork of Firefox : https://github.com/Alex313031/Mercury.
- Waterfox, fork of Firefox :
https://github.com/BrowserWorks/Waterfox. One can add XUL extensions.
Goanna engine (https://www.palemoon.org/tech/goanna.shtml), fork of
Gecko (Firefox 52 ESR), one can add XUL extensions :
- Basilisk : https://basilisk-browser.org.
- Pale Moon : https://palemoon.org.
- Artic Fox, fork of Pale Moon version 27.9.4 :
https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox. Works well with Windows XP
(excepted with https://www.france24.com) and rendering of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=eoY1Mc70uTo is worse than
Mypal rendering.
- SeaLion : https://github.com/wicknix/SeaLion.
Apple WebKit engine (https://webkit.org) :
- GNOME Web (new name of Epiphany) : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web.
- Luakit : https://github.com/luakit/luakit.
- surf : https://surf.suckless.org.
- Nyxt : https://github.com/atlas-engineer/nyxt. Compatible with
WebEngine and Blink (experimental) engines.
- Safe Exam Browser : https://safeexambrowser.org. Windows version
uses Blink engine. To do a kiosk.
Google Blink engine (https://chromium.org/blink/), fork of WebKit :
- Chromium : https://github.com/chromium/chromium. Used by Brave,
Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge.
- ungoogled-chromium, based on Chromium :
https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium
- Iridium, based on Chromium : https://github.com/iridium-browser.
- Thorium, based on Chromium : https://github.com/Alex313031/Thorium.
WebEngine engine (https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine), a Qt version of
Chromium :
- Dooble : https://github.com/textbrowser/dooble.
- Falkon (new name of QupZilla) : https://falkon.org.
- Liri : https://github.com/lirios/browser.
- Otter Browser : https://github.com/OtterBrowser/otter-browser.
- qutebrowser : https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser.
LibWeb engine
(https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/tree/master/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb)
:
- Ladybird : https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird.
Servo engine : https://servo.org.
? engine :
- Kristall : https://github.com/ikskuh/kristall.
- Netsurf : https://www.netsurf-browser.org.
- litehtml : https://github.com/litehtml/litehtml.
Le 28/09/2024 à 11:36, João a écrit :
> Hello Ken,
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 03:29:57PM -0700, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>> We had previously decided that the best browser available for debian PPC was
> Surely the best browser is a matter of personal choice ;)
>
>> SeaLion (https://github.com/wicknix/SeaLion) is the best choice for PowerPC.
>>
>> It works quite well for me, certainly better than anything else I have ever tried.
> SeaLion is definitely worth considering, but it is not part of the distribution,
> and it would be desirable if Debian PPC (we are talking about big endian PPC,
> and I'm using PPC64 myself) would have a modern featurefull browser available.
>
> Of course everyone (I should say most people ;)) would want Firefox, but from
> the threads you quote below I was under the impressions that there was little
> hope to get it working, but from Adrian's email on this thread I get the
> impression that it is still worth pursuing?
>
> Would packaging SeaLion in Debian be a worthwhile alternative goal?
>
>
>> see the threads on this here:
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2023/11/msg00011.html
>>
>> and here:
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2023/11/msg00015.html
>>
>>
>> I don't think anything significant has changed since then.
> Thank you for linking back to those threads which are informative and relevant.
> I don't remember seeing there Epiphany mentioned, and I'm interested in knowing
> if people have it working. It is not on par with Firefox in terms of features,
> but it is a fine browser, supported, and in Debian.
>
> Best regards,
> João
>
--
Passez à Linux :https://infolib.re
.--.
|o_o |
||_/ |
// \\ Envoyé depuis mon Linux
(| |)
/ \_ _/ \
\___)=(___/