Re: Bug#1086128: src:sbcl: fails to migrate to testing for too long

Hi ppc64el porters, Sean,

@porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest 
regressions caused by sbcl [1]?

On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I don't think I can do anything about this bug.  Upstream aren't able to
> reproduce it.  I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on
> this.  I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure
> on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you think that would
> be warranted.

cl-ironclad *and* cl-postmodern. And the error is identical:
no size function for object at 0x100009bf80 (widetag 0x33)

> Please let me know if you would be okay with overriding the test
> failure.

I assuming you didn't contact the ppc64el porters yet (apologies if you 
did). Shall we give them a chance to investigate?

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sbcl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmdNVf8FAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQoV
UAgAuJYMEFwWvDvUA4eN3UpCjLTAHNZSxL9+arD65tLJFvILXtYdgIlRNtsnQEnmws2pajf119YJ
ohQipFGvYG44jGMpxO52m0RhOhyD8RaFy99bOyKegqAYc6f38cS3OIvAAqcoPDnJwrYczC/PfSvc
G87RM/D7vRo2GSkUoxantOqj9hPW18pOs/Rzsbs/jLV7+W3aYZsXL/cbazOTskS0EkPgDsE7asx/
tjwJ1if8PMHcZn9lVigOgOLGseHWDBtTr9JELOwmjPCjDWDoSo6SbNSEbNqmEuFaQgvpIqxZ2TJF
g1wPv+OWM6XfFQklwER7tUa8wnnlHeC+8c6JxQc19Q==
=2GtV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----