Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <c0e7d70991b649a64280eee8e76cd1e6cfe2c042.camel__46872.6854467363$1761643917$gmane$org@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Tue, 2025-10-28 at 10:07 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:59:11AM +0100, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> > Debian isn't Microsoft. Debian isn't Apple. Debian isn't Google.
> > Please don't learn the wrong lessons from them. Planned obsolescence
> > is bad, not good.
> 
> Still, Debian has to rely on stable support in kernel and toolchain.  
> Once kernel and toolchain stop supporting¹ an architecture there is 
> nothing that Debian could do about that with its limited personpower and 
> resources.

POWER8 is still years away from being removed from the kernel and toolchain.

I don't think that anyone at IBM is seriously considering dropping POWER8
support in the kernel or even the toolchain at the moment.

I mean, POWER5 was first announced in 2003 and is still supported by the
Linux kernel and toolchain, so I'm very sure that POWER8 is not going to
go anywhere soon.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.