Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky

John Klos <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <9fc0c48b-7699-694e-7a1e-f76a5b0cb577__11003.2685495511$1761674462$gmane$org@daisy.zia.io>
> yes - maintaining all special cases is an effort.

> yes, but your mileage may vary: You often have a special case where general
> performance measuerement didb't catch the use case.

> yes - that are all people involde in debian or generally in Open Source.

> yes, throwing out old clumsy code with special workaround for old hardware flaws
> is a great cleanup.

It seems you're talking about something different than what the discussion 
is about: this discussion is about the baselines for generated binaries. 
This isn't a discussion about dropping support for certain architectures 
and removing code.

I carefully asked what I asked because I'd like to see real data about 
what advantages there are to defaulting compiler flags to an x86-64 level 
other than default, for instance.

Answering "yes" without providing any information or links to information 
or measurements isn't really all that helpful.

Thanks,
John Klos
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.