Re: Architecture baseline for Forky

Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <aQuokMaWrVr5ApnA__24829.8536100023$1762371803$gmane$org@grub.nussbaum.fr>
Hi,

On 26/10/25 at 13:21 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
> 
> We never did a real discussion about architecture baselines before, but I think
> we should do that.  We also don't have any guidelines what we as Debian want to
> actually support.  But given that we are a general purpose distribution, we
> have to find a balance.

This thread only discusses bumping baselines, but I wonder if we should
consider other ways to provide architecture-optimized versions of some
packages?

https://wiki.debian.org/InstructionSelection lists some, including
glibc's hwcaps.

Also Canonical/Ubuntu decided to enable architecture variants in dpkg
and APT since Ubuntu 2025.10. See:
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/introducing-architecture-variants-amd64v3-now-available-in-ubuntu-25-10/71312
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118567
https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureVariants
https://lwn.net/Articles/1044383/

Lucas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.