Bug#1123864: src:cpufetch: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on ppc64el

Paul Gevers <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Dec 2025 08:44:32 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <cc71c1fc-9fc3-4516-9322-22a5051fcb55__43445.4358344496$1766476055$gmane$org@debian.org>
Source: cpufetch
Version: 1.06-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.07-1
Tags: sid forky ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: out-of-sync
User: [email protected]
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Usertags: ppc64el

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing 
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in 
testing [1]. Your package src:cpufetch has been trying to migrate for 32 
days [2], hence this bug report. The current output of the migration 
software for this package is copied to the bottom of this report and 
should list the reason why the package is blocked.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer 
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be 
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on 
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. 
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its 
(reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper 
the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new 
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

This bug submission immediately closes the bug with the version in 
unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will 
no longer affect testing. This bug is also tagged to only affect sid and 
forky, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to 
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent 
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the 
process, please reach out to me.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg00001.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cpufetch

Current text from [2]:
Migration status for cpufetch (1.06-2 to 1.07-1): BLOCKED: Maybe 
temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing information (check below)
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ Missing build on ppc64el
∙ ∙ Autopkgtest deferred on ppc64el: missing arch:ppc64el build
∙ ∙ Lintian check waiting for test results on ppc64el - info
Additional info (not blocking):
∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - 
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cpufetch.html
∙ ∙ Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻ ∙ ∙ Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻ ∙ 
∙ 32 days old (needed 5 days)
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 585 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=f4Zn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----