Re: Bug#886294: transition: nodejs

On 01/24/2018 06:51 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:24:06PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Our baseline is z10, and z196 is newer. So if upstream now requires z196, we
>> have three options:
>>
>> - Revert / fix that so upstream works with z10 again
>> - Remove nodejs from s390x
>> - Bump our baseline
>>
>> See go and rustc for similar problems.
> 
> All the other buildds are already z13 (either 2964-NE1 or 2964-N63).

Yup. But the more crucial part is what to do about the user-sided
baseline. And I think we're mostly at the point where there isn't an
advantage to keeping the baseline low except a lot of churn on our side
in which no-one else is interested in. People on older platforms could
still use stable for a while.

Does anyone happen to know what the story with Hercules is[1]? I don't
worry about qemu.

Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern

[1] Yes, I feel like I should know.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFFBAEBCgAvFiEEPzuChCNsw7gPxr3/RG4lRTXQVuwFAlppDgYRHHBrZXJuQGRl
Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQRG4lRTXQVuwvAQgAkaYteHs/YVGrfM6RKYVLhd2m0or4CrfQ
Cgs2sJbM+PVHkMpk0s0neUodmuM5DXpU60Zc4x7dwxOJ+jqBpFuIrga+b4XXWpbN
4ITbvnH3wiw4AS91PSE+kimfCm2jJFxDjcxsVHF3NupQ3AjDCZ/GZeZXqast1AUS
jbiwclp8xnIBTb5OERTy+czu5cxmjbV8TDlSRG5vV0zYSh4fIaQhVpTf3u6p/nOT
yvryMkhxwK25rgFAon913z/Q5OYJZg5KvOnO4Gv6e7e0RtiTl+c22g5Is2m1noe4
9g5kbUb6UI/05HuHbP24CoYKc7tItVJYxeiKC2HKseMM5E+H2V9qMg==
=VztH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----