Re: [klibc] Debian #943425: klibc: [s390x] setjmp/longjmp do not save/restore all registers in use
Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:24 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 17:32 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > [...] > > > > > @klibc list: as indicated earlier, I can provide a patch if needed > > > > > (though it should be obvious). > > > > hpa, maks, bwh: any of you taking these two or should I send patches > > and possibly NMU klibc in Debian? > > Please send patches. If you have a test base that could catch bugs test *case* > like this (without writing lists of registers in the test itself), that > would be really useful. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmCS9H8ACgkQ57/I7JWG EQmHRRAAiO/Srv/EQmdS5Mk+buQEaFla+YzTpqpnDc2cZKvERQC+pYLGKgrmg4is LbhAR69hDxnplleFzEJP+kGthUuwPwSFrU/cBbfPuNPzvl0w+jzNdkaZOA0ofmrS XVdX4iHfaJb9o/uTt6VuMs5wSdncgmFtzcR9d9AcbJXhsE2FvYkunA/5dovZTJXj qP+MV/7rCAMq1ejSfijiHd87REcrpnnB+x1A8sEsvFBIGp1XNuXovQxynzTFmQ9U NWuHPmc4aUTF4V3HZe2F2CcXU0I1N/Fki/ePydOxWn1C2JRk2v4Xl1rVWLZZgNmQ xKgXYm5jvjIHa8OAfkhDXhY0NhPBUuQrQkTY2V41hTpzrmx8sCoGCh4I7DqYG4sj a8fS1VHrNO0NpZbHLlsLG8n6yjsE2pPAL5rWgR9g4iiGuUJH2DHUzAzQnIZzviNv lKpSvH6XhrnlhElyl1FTNjYiUBWmTa9Pxs0RzU1QtRqM6LxcLY5tJc6WlNK1xkd3 oKzzfVVRcRwodha6dzerGbck/4dvTlxBJ1GkRuKy4LHJu3cqr7fuJhxHArQ9Ily5 DBU26ApleJs2aTPkD9aFjhD+gqEofcoyTcwfIV5SZhQhCSW5dc4rqHBw/CJifzdB o8eOwlDVPw6FXRhf8llunFd0IiOKOfHLofn48KNJwL7j3Q1lFvM= =pa/B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----