Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390
Message-ID <5a3ccde6-ec5f-a6b1-ca73-a1aa96654cb9__6582.62483063794$1652388618$gmane$org@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Hi!

On 5/12/22 03:29, M. Zhou wrote:
> I learned in disappointment after becoming LuaJit uploader that
> the LuaJit upstream behaves uncooperatively especially for IBM
> architectures [1]. IIUC, the upstream has no intention to care
> about IBM architectures (ppc64el, s390x).
> 
> The current ppc64el support on stable is done through cherry-picked
> out-of-tree patch. And I learned that the patch is no longer
> functional[2] for newer snapshots if we step away from that
> ancient 2.1.0~beta3 release.
> 
> However, architectures like amd64 needs relatively newer version[3],
> while IBM architecture still has demand luajit[4] (only the
> ancient version will possibly work on IBM archs).

I saw that Matej Cepl was replying in the thread who is a colleague of
mine and who is the maintainer of the luajit package in openSUSE/SLE.

Since SUSE has a commercial interest in working POWER/S390 support, he
takes care of the package and makes sure it keeps working on these
architectures.

My suggestion would be to just pick the packages from openSUSE [1]
since they are kept up-to-date.

Adrian

> [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:lua/luajit
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.