Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net

Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390,gmane.linux.debian.ci
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 13-02-2023 15:59, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
> There is some issue with 5.10.0-21 kernel and we are working on it. This 
> can cause performance impact on CI servers.

I have rebooted to the old kernel yesterday. That helps a bit indeed, 
although most of the issues I reported predate that kernel upgrade.

> As Paul mentioned we have upgraded CI servers to better capacity in May 
> last year. Is today’s performance worse than what we observed right 
> after upgrade?

As you can see e.g. here [1,2] it comes and goes (albeit sometimes the 
queue was empty). I don't think its very different, I just never got out 
of the s390x host what I was expecting. Long time I blamed it on the 
"stealing" that happens on a shared host, but I think there's more.

[1] 
https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-s390x-01/ci-worker-s390x-01/debci_packages_processed.html

[2] 
https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-s390x-01/ci-worker-s390x-01/cpu.html

> Is the performance deteriorated consistently over period 
> of time or suddenly observed? Is there any incidence – like 
> change/upgrade in software or hardware component which is coinciding 
> with it if it is sudden change?

James Addison suggested in [3] to increase a prefetch counter in amqp 
(although its the same on all hosts); I have done so on the s390x host 
and at least initially it seems to help keeping the host busier.

[3] https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/debci/-/issues/92#note_381306

Paul
OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, 495 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.