Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net

Philipp Kern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390,gmane.linux.debian.ci
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 16.02.23 17:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As you can see e.g. here [1,2] it comes and goes (albeit sometimes the 
> queue was empty). I don't think its very different, I just never got out 
> of the s390x host what I was expecting. Long time I blamed it on the 
> "stealing" that happens on a shared host, but I think there's more.
> 
> https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-s390x-01/ci-worker-s390x-01/debci_packages_processed.html

So a pet peeve of mine are unitless graphs. Can we please annotate what 
the unit is? If we're looking at "Packages processed by architecture"[1] 
(which again, isn't a workable unit), then we see that s390x does not 
have a bad average, nor an overly bad max - given that it's with one 
worker instead of like 14 for amd64 and 10 for arm64?

The average/max for the week is double for amd64 vs. s390x, so what does 
the queue size mean? Is there still obsolete work in the queue as well 
or does every item have the same value? (There's no way right now it can 
catch up with that many items in the queue. Although that again depends 
on the unit...)

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

[1] 
https://ci.debian.net/munin/debian.net/ci-master.debian.net/debci_total_packages_processed.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.