Bug#1144045: src:octave-instrument-control: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390
Message-ID <8c515002-7a84-4736-b2ac-40f09cd8dc03__37807.2245790221$1786344931$gmane$org@debian.org>
Source: octave-instrument-control
Version: 0.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.1-1
Tags: sid forky
User: [email protected]
Usertags: out-of-sync
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: s390x

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing 
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in 
testing [1]. Your package src:octave-instrument-control has been trying 
to migrate for 33 days [2], hence this bug report. The current output of 
the migration software for this package is copied to the bottom of this 
report and should list the reason why the package is blocked: it failed 
to build on s390x hence I CC-ed the s390x porters.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer 
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be 
fixed via unstable. Blocked packages can have impact on other packages, 
which makes preparing for the release more difficult. The situation that 
caused this bug report might even be the result of such an issue. We 
expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their 
package in a timely manner. If your package in this situation due to 
another package, consider helping out.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new 
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

This bug submission immediately closes the bug with the version in 
unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will 
no longer affect testing. This bug is also tagged to only affect sid and 
forky, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to 
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

This bug report has been automatically generated. If you have any 
comments with regards to the content or the process, please reach out to me.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg00001.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=octave-instrument-control

Current text from [2]:
Migration status for octave-instrument-control (0.10.0-2 to 0.10.1-1): 
BLOCKED: Maybe temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing 
information (check below)
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ Missing build on s390x
∙ ∙ Autopkgtest deferred on s390x: missing arch:s390x build
∙ ∙ Autopkgtest for octave-instrument-control/0.10.1-1: amd64: Pass, 
arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, loong64: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, 
riscv64: Pass
∙ ∙ Lintian check waiting for test results on s390x - info
Additional info (not blocking):
∙ ∙ Updating octave-instrument-control will fix bugs in testing: #1133584
∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - 
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/o/octave-instrument-control.html
∙ ∙ Not reproduced on amd64 (not a regression): octave-instrument-control
∙ ∙ Not reproduced on arm64 (not a regression): octave-instrument-control
∙ ∙ Not reproduced on armhf (not a regression): octave-instrument-control
∙ ∙ Not reproduced on i386 (not a regression): octave-instrument-control
∙ ∙ 33 days old (needed 5 days)
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 585 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=kMG+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.