Re: New Solaris CBE release available
Peter Tribble <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Mar 2026 21:46:35 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEgYsbHePTtBQewHJ9_V_rkzkMogVuVZFEPF2qTO0EMJ9poQ6w@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000641b5f064c61fd87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:37=E2=80=AFPM Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> wro= te: > > > https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris/announcing-a-new-version-of-our-oracle-s= olaris-environment-for-developers > > >> ... the committed support for Oracle Solaris until at least 2037, ... > > Do I smell a "we can't guarantee our stuff will work beyond the year-2038 > problem" here, or is that just a coincidence? ;-) > Given the huge amount of effort they've put in to fix Y2038 issues, I would go for coincidence. (And I imagine the support lifetime isn't set by engineering.) Certainly Solaris are way ahead of where we are in the illumos world wrt Y2038. --=20 -Peter Tribble https://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - https://ptribble.blogspot.com/ --000000000000641b5f064c61fd87 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote g= mail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Mar 6, = 2026 at 9:37=E2=80=AFPM Gregor Riepl <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]= m">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo= te" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204= );padding-left:1ex">> <a href=3D"https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris/announ= cing-a-new-version-of-our-oracle-solaris-environment-for-developers" rel=3D= "noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris/announcing-= a-new-version-of-our-oracle-solaris-environment-for-developers</a><br> <br> >> ... the committed support for Oracle Solaris until at least 2037, = ...<br> <br> Do I smell a "we can't guarantee our stuff will work beyond the ye= ar-2038 problem" here, or is that just a coincidence? ;-)<br></blockqu= ote><div><br></div><div>Given the huge amount of effort they've put in = to fix Y2038 issues, I would go for coincidence.<br></div><div>(And I imagi= ne the support lifetime isn't set by engineering.)<br><br></div><div>Ce= rtainly Solaris are way ahead of where we are in the illumos world wrt Y203= 8.<br></div></div><br><span class=3D"gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>= <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">-Peter Tribble<= br><a href=3D"https://www.petertribble.co.uk/" target=3D"_blank">https://ww= w.petertribble.co.uk/</a> - <a href=3D"https://ptribble.blogspot.com/" targ= et=3D"_blank">https://ptribble.blogspot.com/</a></div></div></div> --000000000000641b5f064c61fd87--