Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:16:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.superh,gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian > > kernel package, and if so how? > > I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love > to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce > the kernel image size at this point though. > > I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel. I made some config changes that bring the size back under the limit: <https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1133>. Can you test that this produces a working kernel? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmadCjQACgkQ57/I7JWG EQkpew/+PH3pyQLjs/t8BxxDiktSyPc+G5vfChsk42H0cu1Vrst3BpZVGcPZfMXz p6f8aD7oTZxtVq7EGMeqWp6vdzqCISPHA1spG1hHtkIjD4yNMb9/cluHjz8+D5Td YwdUQ7r+kaPmMV02BRn7uoY6cVmY1nZU60ml+Y318xiwkOBIP5nqqCWBr5j4zXnv la3gZLe1dj9086CsxRC7ZzFOa+H3hwLfz/OGP+0CTgzKn8WeMh+MdW/319EkP9WM 1aotjbD8wiTwKJOjXwiV/tDm298j26ht2zlU1U+lS9bWy7HOBA492WcKLOalWHMS wzPBIT730gpGEb2PfpS6Uz2GucWyq1paF6o/3rOm7Fs7xssWsgRBUIG+GVfh8bJM n7lZ5DAb9WPwj3BPJqoP49PfmmtbqTIPwHK/HCxQcxEGqtR5BqcRhxJtm9yla7ZK 7U7tBRlVX8Gk9PcMvk1CNK/4asNkeytjc/GMVyDR/4e0GcGMk9aoDNDVgeQGW6oE kLXzpYReOCPRSKxT59E3QCdYHFUtwirDhypqXfeoMSdPM1IEStD2AgYHqWKq++FX QfPcBSyznJZqXk1rx8YS/ZyL4X5+Cy7W4Hw5qbR9CmFQnXTXrVGh77X8I6jfU/G4 j+PyGDYQ8nerNxj54UepEU//K2EvrpAlEFZ2dIi1JZj1s20Anbo= =HMak -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----