Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:16:45 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.ports.superh,gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 14:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 15:16 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian
> > > >   kernel package, and if so how?
> > > 
> > > I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love
> > > to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce
> > > the kernel image size at this point though.
> > > 
> > > I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel.
> > 
> > I made some config changes that bring the size back under the limit:
> > <https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1133>.
> > 
> > Can you test that this produces a working kernel?
> 
> I'll give it a try next week as I'm currently not at home and unable
> to access the board for testing. While I can reach the board via SSH,
> I don't have any kind of remote management.

Are you able to test now?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to write an incorrect program
than to understand a correct one.

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)