Re: How to get started

<[email protected]> Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:57:08 -0000 (GMT)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.windows
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> It could imagine that it would be better to modify the EXE loader in
>> Windows (and DLLs are EXE to Windows AFAIR) to copy the executable to
>> a special location hidden to applications and users first and execute
>> it from there.
>> Sure, we would lose a lot of performance doing it that way, but OTOH
>> this would make Windows behave like I expect it from experience with
>> usual OSes like SunOS or Linux. And, we will not run into problems
>> after an update, like it has to expected when a new EXE requires a
>> changed data or config file format which isn't compatible to the old
>> version.

I'm just a lurker on that list and I haven't got much to contribute but I
think it may be interesting for you to know that this is how the .NET
Platform proceeds to allow live replacement of DLL.

Not all loaded are systematically copied into a temporary directory but a=
n
application wanting to dynamically replace its modules may specify it to
the class loader and bla bla bla so on...

Microsoft working around the problems they themselves created.



--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]=
.org