Re: Where to send tag patches?
Enrico Zini <[email protected]> Fri, 21 May 2004 21:26:42 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.usability |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20040522002642.GA17334@mitac> |
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 05:29:03PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > How much feedback should the user get? Should we handle errors, or > should the submitter recieve them? Should he get a list of packages that > he modified? Or just a "thanks for your contribution"? > The destination address is [email protected] I'd suggest a report on how the input went, like: The tag patch you sent on xxx, received on xxx has been processed successfully. Thanks for your contribution. The Central Debtags Archive Or: The tag patch you sent on xxx, received on xxx has not been processed because of xxx. You should try xxx./You should report xxx. Thanks for your contribution. The Central Debtags Archive A feedback mail would serve both as a confirmation that the work has been considered and as a deterrent for multiple sends (you play too much with the send button, you receive a lot of mail :) . On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 05:56:06PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > > The destination address is [email protected] > You can now submit debtag diff files to this address by attaching them > to a email as mime (or hopefully uuencoded, too) and adding > "-- DEBTAGS DIFF V0.1 --" to the first line. > I just added a tag to a package this way. ;-) I've sent the first test mails with the categorization I did so far. How did it go? If everything is ok, and if the messages are parsed automatically witout your intervention, I'll go on and upload the send-enabled debtags-edit. If there have been errors or you need to parse messages by hand please tell me, as this interface tends to make it simple to push the submit button and I could try changing it a bit. (however, I think it's not a bad idea to have submissions to be a simple thing, and the program is quite neat that way!) Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[email protected]> --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFArp5C9LSwzHl+v6sRAq6GAJ0fOrLd4MtkD7ckQKBxzBe15tF0tQCggDRa w5LsPl7ltfq7NkHGQs0226c= =2wFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--