Re: Tag types - reorganizing all tags - task force

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:

> "Categories" is bad imho, because it's not intuitive that a package has
> many categories it does fit in.
> Maybe we should really use the term "aspect". or "characteristics"?

Or keep staying generic and try "stamp" or "mark".

Tag was a name for a generic label attached to the package: a name good
enough until we will get a better understanding of them.

I personally like "aspect", but I wouldn't be able to say why.  I still
think we could stick with a generic "tag" until we gain more insight
about them.


Yours truly,

Enrico

--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[email protected]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+uQkW9LSwzHl+v6sRAgAgAJ9HlmH1OgQ+Aj6CIvYhbRW01NpMJwCfaL7+
HGarX576EzfBn5xIAwyJOp4=
=KxWh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----