Re: Tag types - reorganizing all tags - task force
Joey Hess <[email protected]> Thu, 8 May 2003 17:43:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.usability |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Erich Schubert wrote: > > What about attributes? Is the word already taken? > > See previous mails. > Package do have several "attributes" already, like the version number, > the package name, the dependencies. I have never heard of those referred to as attributes before. They're generally referred to as fields. The only occurence of the word "attribute" in policy is referring to the urgency=low bit of a changelog. The only occurance in the developer's reference is referring to the LDAP db of developers. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+us9j3xwsXJZQhyMRAnG9AKCUfIv5E8JsjFMvq4WQF5ffk2CHggCfQNDH oBkteZ2vfV611lr4s1ql78k= =kLeV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----