Dropping ibus-pinyin (or salvaging libpyzy)?
Boyuan Yang <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:51:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user.chinese.gb,gmane.linux.debian.user.chinese.big5 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-M4kbYeHOEdlLpxcMvg7b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Please use [email protected] as main discussion list] Dear all, TL;DR: Let's drop package ibus-pinyin from Debian since it implicitly (buil= d- )depends on the unmaintained python2. If we want to save it, considerable amount of work need to be done. Details on the proposed removal of ibus-pinyin are as follows: The default pinyin input method for ibus used to be ibus-pinyin[1] and its upstream is https://github.com/ibus/ibus-pinyin/ . However, in recent years the development shifts towards the libpinyin project, which provides ibus- libpinyin[2] at https://github.com/libpinyin/ibus-libpinyin . The old ibus- pinyin package was deprecated but not removed since someone may still prefe= r to use it. However, ibus-pinyin depends on libpyzy[3], a conversion library between pinyin and bopomofo (a.k.a. zhuyin). This library has a dead upstream at= =20 https://github.com/hsumita/libpyzy , which was exported from googlecode and has no activity in the last 10 years. This library heavily depends on some python2 scripts. Now that the ongoing Python2 removal transition[4] is likely to complete within the Bullseye cycle (you may find a progress chart here[5]), it's lik= ely that the libpyzy library will need to be ported to Python3 or dropped toget= her with ibus-pinyin, perhaps later this year. I'm wondering if anyone is interested in porting python2 scripts in libpyzy project. I had a really quick glance and have an estimation that it will probably requires 5 hours of porting and another 15 hours of testing to ens= ure a proper python3 migration if the developer has good experience in Python2-= >3 porting. Of course, another option is that we completely throw this library= as well as ibus-pinyin away. P.S. I discussed it with the Arch Linux maintainer of ibus-pinyin/pyzy back= in 2016 and 2018; the conclusion was to keep it at that time. Things have chan= ged since then. Let me know if you have any thoughts. Volunteering would be highly welcome. --=20 Regards, Boyuan Yang [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ibus-pinyin [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ibus-libpinyin [3] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libpyzy [4] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html [5] http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/py2removal_progress.png --=-M4kbYeHOEdlLpxcMvg7b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAl6o+aQACgkQwpPntGGC Ws6OYg//QqCU5FuGGUxIBGPhDNgspvp/kSfxN0+QRAQy2mDz+seo8/ErT/W4uokX MqJgfjdQ0jLjCeHR4gsh57UFBWCWCAyfv/fyCa3wiVXi8cXrnfX007hGs0pyWHpl k3qYUA+HVZlvkoUQhwKhAZ9vE1R+hFBmVzi5OcfPuAkDULTushyK3qgnFcp9f6o+ ZoPVJYD3Yv/JCe9lgiFrkwdstoamBKZtBBml7xaRY7zATHp0+zgwRUcT+vQSbTuF ZbkdHqk3bL2ARemZd1CQwrukSOa7Mx4wCbTM9ceg1LD9hkv9xlFzWDnnMbSIVMSB C3hnv4lFyS4B6MncsWGxhm0IHy+SoF2dK3/8ZPjNw1Q6dFw5gBHNfGy5r5yBU5uK FHyyBMW0PSSZJjMTd7luBaisysIn3wXggbL/krTExZN4odF42clGPulnMKV7reZD iu870ZtmcGkQ8n7KUvLtdaU/7u2VkaO4Z5+nuljpqWlwyzaNVYEEgpCIH4Iy+6AH FjWc0toXoJWwGmNbdgXGfa5kHvir3St02AKefdRMOX8pPqoc8/qHCwMSe9kdqjp9 tc1yrMKxRBGj+tFOPlagWBc6Eiv7tOGGyFsJ46MEsu1YtG6hVFcm9lBPMIrkdRSH fGEuCHMjJjot+XQ2FJJ29SZNoR9S+hGdBkIPEYtVC7R+RnZ5Plg= =4TbZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-M4kbYeHOEdlLpxcMvg7b--