Re: RAID config for mailboxes host
"Andrew McGlashan" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:47:09 +1100 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user.isp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <cec81f0516b7c14a5b841672c3920070.squirrel@www.affinityvision.com.au> |
Hi, Sander wrote: > Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote (ao): >> We consider two RAID config for the 12 disks: >> A 2 disks RAID 1 for system >> 10 disks RAID 6 for mailbox space >> B 12 disks RAID 6 for the whole >> In A, we lose 1.2 (raw) TB with respect to B. Advocates of A say that in B, the heads read/write activity of the mailboxes will seriously impact the system performance. In A, the system has its own axes, separate from the mailboxes ones. > > Btw, any reason you go with spinning disks and not with SSDs like Intel 710/720? SSDs are a good fit for maildir workload (random IO). Option A loses 1.2 (raw) TB ..... what size are the disks? Using SSDs at that size will likely not be possible. If it is possible, then it would be extremely expensive. I would prefer the multi RAID6 idea myself. -- Kind Regards AndrewM Andrew McGlashan Broadband Solutions now including VoIP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cec81f0516b7c14a5b841672c3920070.squirrel@www.affinityvision.com.au