RE: Help understanding NTP behaviour
Ross Halliday <[email protected]> Tue, 29 May 2012 09:52:59 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user.isp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C61048EF4F054A4ABBFC3E8B61D2E1F84A5D624D5E@wtc-exchange.wtc.local> |
> I don't think that this is a Debian-specific issue. In my experience > WiFi latency is simply too unstable for timing. Plus these router/CPE > devices are reputed to be less than suitable for use as time servers. Indeed WiFi is - and almost none of these backhauls are 802.11-based. The majority of these links are Motorola/Orthogon and Redline OFDM gear suitable for transporting TDM voice with a bit of Dragonwave thrown in for fun :) I'm not sure where the router/CPE comment comes from as these are devices installed on towers for providing GPS timing pulse to access points, but I do agree. > You may also want to ask your question on the comp.protocols.time.ntp > Usenet news-group or the gatewayed [email protected] mailing > list. > These fora will get you in contact with the NTP developers and core > user > community. > > Please note that you will need to visit > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions and subscribe prior to posting > to the mailing list. > > Fair warning: The NTP developers are rather FreeBSD-centric and don't > care > about package manager integrity; the usual knee-jerk advice is to tell > you to upgrade to the current ntp-developement release from their > source > distribution. Thanks! Appreciate the heads up :) I will ask the folks over there. Cheers --- Ross Halliday Network Operations WTC Communications Office: 613-547-6939 x203 Helpdesk: 866-547-6939 option 2 http://www.wtccommunications.ca