Re: Falkon as a wrapper for basically Chromium (was: Re: New to KDE on Debian)

Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Aug 2025 00:09:54 +0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.user.kde
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 08:44:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> >The other question I have is about Falkon. It works well enough to do
>> >most of the non-commercial browsing I do, plus some news sites. I was
>> >curious how well its keeping up with security patching. I'm trying to
>> >get away from Chromium and Firefox when possible. Any caveats about
>> >using it?
>>
>> Does "Falkon is a wrapper for basically Chromium" count as a caveat?
>
>Should it?

It depends on reasons one has to want to "get away from Chromium and 
Firefox when possible".

-- 
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 894 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yjS5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----