Re: Debian 32-bit or 64-bit

Jos Collin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.user.laptop
Message-ID <CALsRJ1K51BFafyOgaxY15DWT1ERRTJ20K1zMF7CfA8LzA8bHyw@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, I'm using PAE enabled kernel at the moment. So from your replies and
from the stackexchange url, I understand that using 64 bit Debian is better
and having better performance than 32-bit. Unless there is a good reason to
use 32-bit OS. So I would like to go for a 64-bit Debian installation. What
is the minimum required RAM for a 64-bit Debian ?

Regards,
Jos Collin

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Aleksandar Atanasov <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
> ​Hi, Jos :)
>
> Well, in order to produce 64bit binaries you would need a 64bit system
> (although maybe with QEMU you can omit that but it's not worth it).
> RAM-wise it's no problem to stay with 32bit because of the PAE (physical
> address extension) that is a feature of the Linux kernel that you either
> already have with your current one or need to add (by downloading a
> PAE-enabled kernel image). For more information on PAE you can read at
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension. Your CPU has to
> support this extension (from what I've seen at
> http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Core_2/Intel-Core%202%20Duo%20Mobile%20T7700%20LE80537GG0564M.html
> in the section *Other features* at the bottom it does support it). You
> can also check http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/12071 on a discussion
> whether to use 32bit with PAE enabled or pure 64bit OS.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.